Showing posts with label photographer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photographer. Show all posts

Friday, December 18, 2015

Elements of Composition - #4 - Framing


The easiest way to describe the concept of framing is it's like having a frame inside the image.  This has two purposes, one is it can contain the image and trap the audience's eye, and secondly it can ad depth.

In this case I think it's easier to see what I am talking about than to try and explain it. 


  

The window pane frames the spider in the image above.  This is a pretty clear example of a frame, but you might also have elements that are dark or imply framing.  Below are more examples.


Here the scaffolding frame the crucifix. 


In the image above, the straight lines and darker areas frames around Faris from the band Prime Eights. 

An example of artificially inserting framing during post processing is to add a vignette.  Sometimes this is obvious and one would presume that the photographer was not trying to hide this effort.  Other times it can be applied subtly to bump up otherwise poor composition, lighting or various other reasons. 

Below is such an example.  I was shooting a model testing out a new flash and I was limited in my choice of location so I didn't have ideal situation.  So I made the best out of what I got and I tried to use some vignetting to help focus the audiences attention on the model. 

Below is the original picture out of the camera:


There was just to much stuff going on around the subject that was distracting - plus the flash hit her straight in the face and her head looks photoshopped. In post processing I decided to tone down the beam above her head and get rid of some of the other distractions using the vignette tool.

 

In Lightroom, vignettes are pretty easy to add. You will find it in the Develop Tab toward the bottom. It looks like this.  The screenshot below shows the settings for the image above. 


Well thanks for reading this far.  More articles on the Elements of Composition are coming.See the links below to the previous artiles in this series.  

If you like this blog please subscribe!  

Links to other articles in the series:
To see #1 - Rule of Thirds - Go HERE
To see #2 - Balance - Go HERE
To see #3 - Lines - Go HERE

Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/goddom
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapturedPhotons
Twitter: @capturedphotons



Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Moon Photography!

Moon, mid-eclipse. 200mm lens, ISO 400, f4, 1s shutter speed


Sorry, this is a little late to capture the lunar eclipse, but taking pictures of the full moon can still be fun even when its not being eclipsed.

Before I get started talking about exposure and lenses and such I wanted to explain someone that may not be obvious and understanding this will help you better understand how to take pictures of the moon.  The moon, which you may know is being illuminated by direct light from the sun.  And, the moon is essentially the same color as concrete.  Basically, this means the moon is as bright as a sidewalk on sunny day.  So don't be surprised that you may find that a proper exposure is going to be somewhere in the ballpark of ISO 400, f/16, at 1/250th.

Fun fact - the human eye/brain completely exaggerates the size of the moon and it is always disappointingly small in photos so you will want to use as long a lens as you can.  200-300mm for instance would be much more preferred.

You can shoot a time-lapse of the moon but it moved quite a bit in 30 seconds.  Below you can see two images taken 30 seconds apart and see how much the moon has moved in that interval.



So you can shoot a time-lapse but the moon will move across the frame unless you use some sort of star tracking tripod - which I don't have... yet.  It seems like I do more and more astrophotorgaphy so I may pony up a few hundred dollars to be able to do this.

Below is my off the cuff time lapse that I shot.  Since the moon moves so much I had to adjust the camera every 30 minutes or so.  Also, I had to adjust the exposure not only because of the eclipse but also because of cloud cover.  That is why at times the moon seems to disappear is because I stepped away from the camera and clouds rolled in and obscured the moon.  Also speed at which the moon moves is due to a change in interval timing.  At first I was taking pics every 30 seconds, but toward the end I switched to 15 second intervals.

Enjoy!



Thursday, February 26, 2015

Organizing Your Photos -

Strategies and Tips

Organizing photos has always been a problem even in the age of film though the volume of photos people can generate has magnified significantly with digital.  There are a number of strategies for organizing photos and I will go into some detail what I do and perhaps you can take use this my process or develop your own to help you keep your images sorted.  The key is to figure out your system and then make sure to follow it as you unload photos from your camera onto your computer because once you get behind it can be hard to find the time and/or the motivation to clean up the files.  Then you run the risk of losing photos you treasure either because you accidentally delete them thinking they are stored somewhere else or your computer dies and you don’t get them backed up properly.

Really the only way to organize digital images is to figure out some sort of file structure that you can place your photos into.  It seems that people typically decide to organize by date (ie 2-15-2015), or event name (ie “Christmas at Grandma’s”).  Now there are advantages and disadvantages to both. For instance, you may not remember what date something happened on so you will find yourself spending a decent amount of time searching through folders trying to find the photos you are looking for.  Also, if you don’t use the right date format you will find that your folders won’t be in the order you expect.  For instance, if you use the format 1-7-2015, then all your January dates will be grouped together, then February, etc.  On the other hand, if you list it by event name and you don’t remember what you called the event – for instance you remember is was at Grandma’s house, but you forgot you called it “Christmas at Grandma’s” you will have to read each folder name until you find it.  What I have found that works the best is a combination of the two. 


Here is an example of how I organize my photos.

My top level folder I call “Photography”.  Under that I have a folder for different years 2007, 2008, 2009… etc.  Within each
year I have folders for events “Renaissance Fair”, “4th of July”, and the like.  Since I started I have gotten into Milky Way time lapse which has become quote a large portfolio.  Each shoot yields hundreds of photos and since I didn't want to have to dig through my general photography images to find these I created a new broad category labelled “Time Lapse.”  In this folder I use a slightly different strategy to organize my files since I seem to shoot in the same locations regularly and the date is irrelevant to me, under the main folder I have a folder for different locations.  Those folders are then sub divided into more folders with descriptive names like “Silos with clouds” – which means something to me but probably not anyone else.  I have also created large broad categories to organize photos of local bands I shoot, Infrared photography and one folder dedicated to my daughter.  


This shows how Lightroom is organized .
As you broaden your photography interests you might make other broad categories  as well – such as Weddings or Real Estate or what have you. This works well not only for general file organization, but also works well in Lightroom.  Now each broad category can become its own Lightroom catalog.  The only issue I have had is if you want to transfer images from one catalog to another it can be a little cumbersome – but perhaps this was solved since v2.7( yeah I am a little behind the times…)

Maybe you are just taking pictures of your family and some landscapes or whatnot you could still separate the images into broad categories such as “Kids” or “Dogs.”  My mother-in-law takes pictures of trees.  She could have one folder labelled “Trees”, a folder for “Family” and then “General.”  Really, you can adapt this to you own personal needs.

One note that I would like to stress, if you do choose to label folders by date, is not to use the standard American date format (ie month-day-year).  The folders, which are usually sorted by name, will have all the months grouped together and your folders will be out of chronological sequence.  So, for example, all your January folders will be together, then all your February and so on and so on.  See example below.  The 1/1/2001 then the 1/1/2002 are next to each other.  

Naming Files with month first will group months together as opposed to grouping years together.
My suggestion is to label them year first, then month and day - always using 4 digits for year, 2 digits for month and 2 digits for day.  See below. This standardizes the titles of the folders and makes it easier to find a particular date. 

Name them with year first and they will be in chronological order. 


Backing Up Files:
On a side note, once you have a pretty well established file system, backing up files becomes that much easier.  I am not going to get into to much detail here since this is a whole other topic in itself but I mention it now since you should develop a backup routine because no hard drive or computer is going to last forever.  There are a couple different things you can do now to help protect your files.  One is to back them up onto an external drive on a regular basis.  They have become much more affordable and you can find a 1TB external hard drive for about $60 online.  Another option is to use a "Cloud" backup.  Meaning you upload your images/files to some online service.  This is a great option since internet servers (where your files will be stored ) have a very regimented and robust backup process and its highly unlikely that the data will be lost.  There are a couple disadvantages to this however, one being there is likely a monthly/yearly cost if you want to store more than 5GB of data, and secondly, uploading a lot of large files may take a long time or be impractical if you don't have access to high speed internet.  


Saturday, January 18, 2014

Arduino Time-Lapse Dolly Project Part 3

Arduino Time-Lapse Dolly Project Part 3

Stepper Into Motion

Now that I have tried the relay hooked up to the camera, got a button to fire it, and now its time to test the stepper motor.

First I should briefly explain what a stepper motor is and why I choose to use one.  They are called stepper motors because they move in small incremental steps which is generally measured in degrees.  So a 1.8 degree motor will take 400 little steps per revolution.  Because the motor can move in these small increments, it can (depending on the quality of the motor) make some very precise movements.  That is why I chose such motor for my application since I need the camera to move in consistent, accurate movements between shots.

I am using the Adafruit motor shield.  After I bought it, and started to figure out more about these crazy motor shields they can only handle so much power which means the motors can't draw to much power itself.  The Adafruit ones can handle 1.2A and I found it difficult to find a motor that was less than that. I eventually got one that draws .4A but I am not sure it will be powerful enough to move the camera... we will see!  Regardless it was only $15 so it if doesn't work I can at least use it to test everything out.

The Adafruit website is actually pretty handy and they have a lot of tutorials which is super awesome (see this link here) - though the one for this motor shield was slightly wrong at points, it was right enough that you can figure it out.  First thing first was to download the motor shield library. For instance, the tutorial said once the library is installed it should be accessible through the File/Examples/AFMotor, but that never happened for me.  It does show up under Sketch/Import Library/AFMotor and when you select it you get a "#include " added to the code - I assume always to the top but I haven't done it when there was code present.  Don't let this bother you, keep following the Adafruit tutorial and it has a lot of useful information and some example programming.  I used that example to help with my code below.  

Next step was wiring the sucker up.  For a test, and test only, I used a 9v battery to power the motor.  In real life the battery probably doesn't have enough juice to fully power the stepper motor I am using nor will it have the longevity that I need - 600+ cycles.  I bought a 9v battery hookup and wired it to the board at the Ext. PWR block.  Next to that, there is a jumper. Per the Adafruit tutorial if you want to use an external power supply to run the motor that is separate from the Arduino board, then you remove the jumper.  If you Arduino power supply (ie USB cable) is going to power both then leave the jumper in place.  As a side note, my experience is that even with the jumper removed, when I plugged the Arduino in to the USB to update the program it moved the motor.

Blur block next to the EXT PWR is where you can hook up the power.  The red circle on the right is where the jumper is located.  In this photo, I have already removed the jumper. 

I got a Primopal motor because it was cheap (~$15 shipped), and it was nice that Primopal had data sheets available for all their motors.  Without some sort of tech sheet you will have to figure out how to wire the motor to the board.  Now I am not expert on stepper motors but some are uni-polar and some are bi-polar.  Uni-polar motors have 5 wires and bi-polar have 4.  Either one will work, the shield allowed for both to be hooked up.  There are online resources that will show you how to wire the motor if it doesn't have a data sheet.

To test the motor I used Adafruit's tutorial code with some simple changes.  The motor I have is 1.8 degrees per step, and Adafruit is using a 7.5 degrees per step.  So I changed the steps from 100 to 400 (see red text below).  I also changed the rpm from 10 to 60 just because.

#include


AF_Stepper motor(48, 2);


void setup() {
  Serial.begin(9600);           // set up Serial library at 9600 bps
  Serial.println("Stepper test!");

  motor.setSpeed(10);  // 10 rpm

  motor.step(100, FORWARD, SINGLE);
  motor.release();
  delay(1000);
}

void loop() {
  motor.step(400, FORWARD, SINGLE);
  motor.step(400, BACKWARD, SINGLE);

  motor.step(400, FORWARD, DOUBLE);
  motor.step(400, BACKWARD, DOUBLE);

  motor.step(400, FORWARD, INTERLEAVE);
  motor.step(400, BACKWARD, INTERLEAVE);

  motor.step(400, FORWARD, MICROSTEP);
  motor.step(400, BACKWARD, MICROSTEP);
}



Now - to tie my camera shutter, and stepper motor together I wrote this code.  A button sets the whole thing in motion.  It will take 20 photos and advance the camera on the track 20 times (see the yellow highlighted section of the code in which this number is set). Keep in mind I have a MEGA board and not the regular Uno board, so I have more pins.  The button and relay are hooked to ports 52 and 53.


#include

AF_Stepper motor(200, 2);  //number of steps per revolution and indicates which port the motor is wired to.

const int buttonpin = 53;  //number of the pin the button is connected too
const int camerapin = 52; //number of the pin the relay to trigger the camera is connected too

int buttonstate = 0;

void setup() {

 pinMode(camerapin, OUTPUT);
 pinMode(buttonpin, INPUT);

 // Setting up the stepper motor
 Serial.begin(9600);           // set up Serial library at 9600 bps
  Serial.println("Stepper test!");  //probably not a necessary line....

  motor.setSpeed(60);  // 60 rpm
 }

void loop(){
  buttonstate = digitalRead(buttonpin);

  if (buttonstate == HIGH){
 
    for (int i=0; i<20 span="">; i++) //this will be the stepper motor camera trigger loop, i dictates the number of times the camera shoots
  {
    digitalWrite(camerapin, HIGH);
    delay(3000);
    digitalWrite(camerapin, LOW);
    delay(500);
    motor.step(400, FORWARD, SINGLE);
    delay(1000);
  } //ends the FOR statement
 }  //end IF statement
} //ends LOOP



Next Steps - make a track and dolly for the camera!

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Isle Royale Cont.

On day 4 it was time to hike back to Three Mile camp. I could have decided to just stay at Daisey Farm, but it seemed better to hike 7 miles on this day and only 3.4 Friday to catch the ferry instead of vice versa. However, the day was gorgeous; a warm bright sun fended off the chilly Lake Superior breeze. This was the first day during the whole trip that I wore a t-shirt. All my previous days I had been wearing several layers of light jackets, a sweater, long sleeve shirt and a short sleeve shirt. It may sound uncomfortable, but it was actually quite ideal. At any given time I could either shed or add layers to keep at a comfortable temperature.

Here are some pictures that took to try and campture the magic of the scenery. What I was not able to do was get a picture that accurately portrays the ancient, wizen, and heartiness of the trees, lichen, moss, and rocks. The island looks like something you would find in a magical kindgom of elves and gnomes. Many of the trees are covered in moss, the moss covers the ground and the rocks are painted with lichen.


Here is a picture of Three Mile camp... or the dock anyways since the camp is well hidden in the trees.


Sunset on my last night on the island:
Here is a night shot I took that same night:

I am hoping to make time next year to take this trip again. If I go a little later in the season, the berries will be in season and while hiking you can also graze.

If you have any questions feel free to ask. You can get my contact information here.

Please feel free to visit my web page.

Thanks,
Matthew Eddy
Photographer

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Isle Royale Trip 5/25-5/29/2009 CONT...

Day 2:
Staying the night in the shelter was pretty chilly. The wind blew right into the shelter and made the night a little uncomfortable. At about midnight I wrapped the rain fly of the tent around me to help cut the wind. My sleeping bag is rated to 20 degrees F, I have a full sized inflatable sleeping pad, and I was wearing long johns and a light wool sweater.

I got up at around 8, cooked a hearty breakfast of oatmeal, packed up and was on the trail by 10 am or so. Off hand, I can't recall how long it took me to get to Moskey Basin, but I think I was there by about 1:30 or so. The hike from Three Mile to Daisy Farm was pretty easy. Daisey Farm to Moskey Basin was a bit tiring since the trail moves away from the coast and goes up into the hills a bit. It seemed that a lot of people had the same idea as myself to make Moskey Basin a final destination. Threre were only a few shelters and tent sites available. However, the design of the camp ground was such that I found a relatively secluded tent site. Given the night I had, I wanted a tent site, and it was a great decision. It sprinkled a little that night and but I was warm any cozy in my little tent.

I didn't do much after arriving in Moskey Basin since the weather was a little ugly, with some showers and high winds.


Day 3:
The weather didn't start getting good until Wednesday night just before sunset. I was hoping that it was clear a little earlier, and I decided to hike out to Lake LaSage. As I was hiking out, I ran into one small group who said that people reported fresh wolf tracks and scat. Out around Lake LaSage, I did see tracks and some fresh scat. Originally I was hoping to stay out there for a while and get some nice shots of the sunset over the lake, but I am happy that I decided to head back to Moskey Basin since I got to watch one of the best sunsets I have seen in a long time. Below are pictures of the sunset. It was amazing how the clouds changed, and












This was one of the LONGEST sunsets I have ever experienced. I think the sun technically set at around 9pm, but it wasn't until after 10 or closed to 11 that the sky started to get dark. The next night I was trying to take pictures of the stars and I had to wait until midnight before the light from the sun had dimmed enough to start to even SEE the stars. Also, as you can see by the pictures, the light, sky and colors changed dramatically over the course of the sunset.

Ill post more later.


Thanks,

Matthew Eddy

Photographer

http://www.oil-rigs.net/

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Isle Royale Trip 5/25-5/29/2009

For those of you who are unaware of what Isle Royale National Park is or where it is located here is a brief description. The island is a wild life preserve whose remoteness and rugged wilderness make it a wondrous place for avid outdoors person. I was attracted by the isolation the possibility of seeing moose, and the hope that I would hear a wolf howl. The island is approximately 45 miles long, and 8.5 miles wide at its widest point. Because the island is some distance away from the main land, there are only 10 mammal species that reside on the island such as moose, wolf, and fox. There are NO bears or racoons.

For those of you in the know, and what some quick info on the conditions of the island here is my experience in a nut shell.

Moose: I didn't see any. Apparently this time of year is when the expecting mothers go off to secluded areas to give birth. Since the weather is still chilly, and the plants along Lake Superior haven't really bloomed, the male moose were foraging up on the rdige. So the 2 people who I met that did see moose, they saw them up on the ridge (2 of them), and at Feldtman Lake (6 moose).

Foxes: I didn't see any, and I didn't have any issues with them raiding my gear, though I was careful to keep my boots in my tent or shelter anyways.

Bugs: 2 mosquitoes and lots of flys my last 2 days when it warmed up a bunch.

Wolves: I didn't see any. Apparently one guy did see a wolf walk past his shelter. I didn't hear any, but I did see fresh tracks and fresh scat and tons of old dried scat.

Weather: Chilly and overcast the first 2.5 days, but bearable. The last 2.5 days the sun came out and it warmed up quite a bit. A little sprinkle of rain my second night, but that was it.

Crowds: The boat on the way out and back was pretty full, but then again, it is only running Monday and Friday, so about 40-60 people coming out for the week.

Day 1:
I have a quick plug for the North Port Motel. As I was preparing to leave for the ferry, when I locked my keys in my car, and even though I had all my backpacking gear out, I still had stuff that I needed to put in the car. Well, the people at the motel let me leave my car at the motel all week, and even had the sheriff unlock the car while I was away. It was so nice getting back and not having to worry about getting the car unlocked.

I left from Copper Harbor on the Isle Royale Queen IV. The ferry ride out was smooth, there were almost no swell or waves to speak of. Three hours after leaving, we were pulling into Rock Harbor. After disembarking, the rangers gathered everyone around and gave a little presentation on "Leave No Trace" camping, answered and few questions and then let groups register. When you register, you give them your estimated itinerary but if you deviate from the itinerary you gave them, you simply correct it when you turn it back into the ranger station when you check back in.

I was one of the last people to leave Rock Harbor to head to my first camp. Originally I was hoping to make it to Daisy Farm, but I met up with Eric and Taylor, two guys who I sat with on the ferry ride, and when we reached Three Mile Camp, and no one else was there, we decided to make camp. It was only 2 pm, but I was over burdened with camera gear, and the three miles of trail from Rock Harbor to Three Mile Camp is very rocky and tiresome. But since there was still a lot of daylight, I decided to hike up to Mount Franklin, which was approximately 2.5 miles each way. On the way up I saw a moose antler laying on the side of the trail and many small trees that had been racked by a bull moose's antlers. The view from the top was nice, but I didn't take any pictures since the day was overcast, but I could see Canada from the top.



Here is the moose antler that was laying on the side of the trail. It looks like its been there for some time, and it will probably be there for a few more years if no one trys to take it.



At Three Mile Camp, I had taken a shelter for the night, but in hindsight I would have preferred sleeping in my tent since the shelters are a bit colder, and the wind just blew right into the shelter. Probably, when its warmer and there are more bugs, the shelters may be preferable, but at this time, the tempertures during the day were probably in the mid 60's with a chilly wind off the water, and at night I am sure it dipped into the low 40's. So, in the shelter, that cold wind blew right in since the front of the shelters is just like a big screen door.


Again, not many pictures since the days were over cast and the lighting was crummy. It wasn't until the Wednesday and Thursday that I really started to take pictures since the sun came out.

Continued on next post...

Matthew Eddy
Photographer
www.oil-rigs.net

Thursday, May 14, 2009

My Digital Pinhole Camera

I have never seriously pursued pinhole photography, but idea of it, and the soft dreamy scenes have always appealed to me. One day I got this wild idea to make a pinhole lens for my D300. So, without consulting the all mighty internet for ideas, I set about making this lens. Whatever the outcome, I wanted a lens that was professional looking, and not something like a cardboard tube with aluminum foil taped over the front or something like that. To me, this dictated that the lens had to mount to the camera on the Nikon F mount. The only items that I could think of that could mount to the body of the camera were a lens or extension tubes used for macro photography. If I wanted to use a lens, I would have to strip it of its glass, or remove the mount from the lens and somehow attach the pinhole to the mount. I looked at my small inventory of lenses, and though I had some real cheap lenses, they all worked, and I couldn't make myself disassemble one. That left me, in my mind, two options. Try and find a broken or very cheap lens (I was thinking $5-15 is my budget for this project) or find really cheap extension tubes. For some reason, I thought a set of extension tubes would run me $50+, so I didn't bother to look at what was available. Instead, I search craigslist, and ebay for broken lenses. No luck. On a whim, I search ebay for extension tubes and found a ton that were only $10 (that included shipping). So I bought a set. Of course it was coming all the way from China, and I didn't expedite the shipment so it took about 2 weeks to get the extension tube set in the mail. My expectations for this product was fairly low, and I pretty much expected them to be made out of plastic, but they are aluminum. Even still, I am very careful not to cross thread them or try and tighten the various extension tubes to much since I am sure the threads will just get torn apart.

With extension tubes in hand, how do I turn them into a pinhole lens? I am lucky and work for a medium to large machine shop and a friend of mine who is a machinist offered to make me something if I drew up a print. So, 2 minutes to draw something up for him, and a day for him to machine it for me I had a part that looked like a lens cap that as threaded and could be screwed onto the entension tubes. Below are some pictures.

Here is the extension tube set with the aluminum pinhole adapter.




For those not aware of how extension tubes work, the tubes are a set of 5 parts, first part has the nikon body mount on one side and threaded on the other. Three parts ar basically just spacers that thread onto the first part. The last part threads on the end and the lens mounts onto it. So the pinhole adapeter is threaded to screw onto any one of the spacers.

Here is another image with the extension tubes and adapter.


Here is a picture with the adapter screwed onto the end of the extension tube.



So now I need to make a pinhole in something. My first attempt was using aluminum foil like most pinhole cameras are made with. The results were less than desirable. At first I thought this project was all for not. I was not naive to think that I was the first one to come up with this hair brained idea, and given my poor results, I decided to look on the internet and see how other people's pinhole cameras turned out. I found one guy who punctured a hole in a can and seemed to have the image quality that I wanted mint to have.

Here is a sample image using the aluminum foil.


So I took a coke can and cut it up, sanded it on both sides and used a thumb tack to make a hole. The idea, when making the hole, was to make the smallest possible hole. So I tried to stick it in just enough to start penetrating the aluminum. Since the pressure of the pin dents the aluminum, I sanded the front and back one more time.

Here are some of the tools I used.


Here is a macro shot of the hole (using the extension tubes as intended!).


Now I need to affix this to my pinhole adapter. This image has a close up of the hole along to the top since its difficult to see.


Now for a picture of the whole rig on my N80 film camera.


Pretty sexy for a pinhole camera... well I think so anyways, but I am a bit of a photo geek.

So how does this new hole compare to the terrible picture above? Check it out!

Yeah, its soft, but much better than the other, in my opinion. I even refined the hole a bit, and made one a touch smaller and got an image that was a little better. These small images may make it difficult to see the difference but here is a comparison anyways.

When using the aluminum foil, my hypothesis is that the pin creates a ridge of displaced material on one side of the pinhole. This ridge interferes with the image quality, but when using an aluminum can, the ridge can be sanded away, and the image quality is much improved.

Now I need to take it into the field and really play around!

Until next time...

Matthew Eddy
Photographer
http://www.oil-rigs.net/

Sunday, February 1, 2009

My new lens: Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8

WOW

What else is there to say? All the reviews say the same. For me, this lens on my D300 is perfect. I bought a Sigma 18-50mm, and I am happy with it, but since the D300 is a DX camera, there is a 1.5 magnification to the equivalent focal length of the lens - and I just couldn't get wide enough with 18mm. An 18mm lens on my D300, is like a 27mm lens on a film camera. However, a 14mm lens is like a 21mm lens on a film camera, and there is a huge difference between 21mm and 27mm! I really don't know waht else to say about this lens except that I want to take more pictures with it. Because of the overcast light, I didn't have problems with flare, but I happy with the contrast the lens managed on such a muddy day. I also noticed that I didn't have much perspective correction to make when at 20-24mm.

For now, I think my lens collection is pretty complete between the 14-24mm Nikkor, and the 18-50 f/2.8 Sigma, and a 70-210mm f4-5.6 lens since I don't do much work past 50mm mark anyway. The 24-70mm f/2.8 Nikkor lens looks pretty tempting since I would like to get a FX body at some point and the Sigma only works on the APS-C sensor bodies. Well, for now, I am pretty well set on lenses.

If you aren't sure what I am talking about when I refer to DX camera, and 1.5x magnification, feel free to email me and I would be more than happy to explain it to you.

Well here are a couple of shots I took early Saturday morning.




Just a little self promotion, but I am a local Ann Arbor MI photographer and my website can ber viewed here.

If you are interested in photography, and can't find any local classes, then check out this page of my website here. Since I teach a class through Ann Arbor's Rec and Ed department, I have put together a few powerpoint presentions on the fundamentals of photography and you can download the pdf versions.

Thanks,
Matt

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Update - NEW CAMERA!

Well I am finally getting back to my roots in the film world. After getting the D300, I have traded my old D70s to a friend for a Hasselblad 500C. On top of that, I mixed up some of the good 'ole D76 film developer that I had kept in a drawer for probably 6 years now and developed roll of film from the Hasselblad. Now all I need is a film scanner, and I can stick to the digital work environment. However, I do have an enlarger sitting the basement right now.... maybe this weekend Ill plug it in an make some prints. Ill have to buy some new photo paper... Hmmm

Another option is to have the negatives scanned professionally, but when I found out how much that cost I am going to have to start saving my pennies. If I shoot 10 rolls of medium format film, then Ill will just about pay for the negative scanner.

For my invisible audience ( I am not sure how many people are reading this, I thinks its just me, myself and I at this point), you can anticipate me revealing my big photo project in the next couple of weeks. I have been working on the beginings of it for a few months now.

Take care.

Website: www.oil-rigs.net

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Red Cross ball (10-11-08)



Almost two weeks ago I covered a charity auction/banquet for the Washtenaw County Red Cross. Here is a sample of some of the pictures I took at the event. Before I started volunteering, I didn't realize all the services that the Red Cross provided, such as assisting people whose house had caught fire. Besides helping out, volunteering with the Red Cross is providing a lot of great experience covering fast moving events and anticipating the great candid moments.




Here is the auctioneer in action trying to motivate the bidders to bring the price up. It was fun to watch, he was pretty funny.


The waiters were all dressed in costume - there was a WWII era theme to the event.









There was a "big band" and swing dancers. With the dancers I was trying to get a great shot using a slow flash, and I didn't get anything I was super happy about, but I did get some good panning shots.



In the next week I'll post images from Ashley and Jeff Kermath's wedding I covered on the 4th of October. Got some great shots I am happy with.